The fact that no radioactive substances other than ruthenium were measured is a clear indication that the source must have been a nuclear reprocessing plant.
The geographic extent of the ruthenium cloud was also remarkable - it was measured in large parts of Central and Eastern Europe, Asia and the Arabian Peninsula. Ruthenium was even found in the Caribbean.
The data was compiled by an informal, international network of almost all European measuring stations. In total, measuring stations from 29 countries were involved.
As unusual as the release may have been, the concentration of radioactive material has not reached levels that are harmful to human health anywhere in Europe. From the analysis of the data, a total release of about to terabecquerel of ruthenium can be derived. To date, no state has assumed responsibility for this considerable release in the fall of The evaluation of the concentration distribution pattern and atmospheric modelling suggests a release site in the southern Urals.
The Russian reprocessing plant had already been the scene of the second-largest nuclear release in history in September - after Chernobyl and even larger than Fukushima. At that time, a tank containing liquid waste from plutonium production had exploded, causing massive contamination of the area.
Th is philosophical divide puzzled both camps. Order by , and we can deliver your NextDay items by. Th is would be premature, they argued, since other explanations could be imagined. On the other hand, one can not hope to imagine thus a priori a complex theory in accord with experience. Click on the cover image above to read some pages of this book! Fajans sent his student Lembert to work with Richards on the atomic weight of lead from uranium. Blanc, reported similar failures.
Olivier Masson and Georg Steinhauser can date the current release to the time between 25 September , 6 p. In contrast, the releases from Chernobyl or Fukushima lasted for days.
Contact: Prof. Ladda ned. Spara som favorit. Laddas ned direkt.
Skickas inom vardagar. This is the story of a new science.
Beginning with an obscure discovery in , radioactivity led researchers on a quest for understanding that ultimately confronted the intersection of knowledge and mystery. Mysterious from the start, radioactivity attracted researchers who struggled to understand it.
What caused certain atoms to give off invisible, penetrating rays? Where did the energy come from? These questions became increasingly pressing when researchers realized the process seemed to continue indefinitely, producing huge quantities of energy.
This is the story of a new science. Beginning with an obscure discovery in , radioactivity led researchers on a quest for understanding that ultimately. Radioactivity. A History of a Mysterious Science. Marjorie C. Malley. This is the first book of its kind to present the history of radioactivity as an entity in itself.
Investigators found cases where radioactivity did change, forcing them to the startling conclusion that radioactive bodies were transmuting into other substances. Chemical elements were not immutable after all.
Radioactivity produced traces of matter so minuscule and evanescent that researchers had to devise new techniques and instruments to investigate them. Scientists in many countries, but especially in laboratories in Paris, Manchester, and Vienna unraveled the details of radioactive transformations.
They created a new science with specialized techniques, instruments, journals, and international conferences.